Only with slight difference that you can actually upload your own key protected by the passphrase. They're currently also working on a feature that would allow Protonmail-like scenario, i.e. And it's so much easier to implement, rather than trying to build a web interface that would satisfy everybody, a bunch of mobile apps and a Bridge app for several platforms. It is definitely more flexible as encryption is being used by you at your own discretion.ģ. This is much more secure, as your private key is stored at your own device (speaking of true end-to-end encryption).Ģ. Using their regular IMAP you can decrypt your mail and using a regular SMTP send emails encrypted with any keys you want.ġ. Why don't Protonmail do what does? They give you an ability to upload you own public key and encrypt all incoming emails with it. Then people wonder why gmail and the like are still popular.ĭon't bother sending me an email to address provided by the way, it's from a shitty service that doesn't allow IMAP to free accounts.Īs yet another Linux user I absolutely agree with what was already said by previous speakers. Yet the almighty protonmail can't even allow you to download your messages to your computer without paying a nominal fee? Outrageous. Until I met protonmail I hadn't encountered an email service that prevented IMAP to free accounts since the early 2000s. You say that these restrictions are so you'll upgrade to a paid account to pay for the free accounts (etc, etc, etc) but are they really? I find it strains the imagination that GOOGLE will allow you to download your emails and send them FOR FREE and of course they use ads and crawling software to pay for it. EMAIL.Įven IMAP only would be a godsend because AT LEAST I could download to my computer and only login to send messages as necessary. Why is it that you have to pay to use the email re-routing services? I need to integrate my old accounts so I continue to get email and download to my computer so I don't have to tediously logon and check EVERY.
0 kommentar(er)
